The CEFR in Thailand: Reevaluation, recontextualization and integration into language policy and practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17509/rz1bhj53Keywords:
CEFR in Thailand, Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), Framework of Reference for English Language Education (FRELE-TH), language policy and practiceAbstract
The adoption and implementation of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) in Thailand and the localized Framework of Reference for English Language Education (FRELE-TH) were part of national efforts to improve Thai students’ English proficiency to be aligned with global benchmarks, such as the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) and the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). Part of this evaluation involved reviewing policy documents, academic literature, and the CEFR-CV (2018/2020). Additionally, the utilization of mediation, plurilingual and pluricultural competence, and action-oriented learning in the Thai educational context was examined to offer expanded reference levels and descriptors for localizing the CEFR. Several studies have found the adoption has encountered challenges in terms of practical application. For instance, teachers face several challenges, including limited familiarity with the framework, overemphasis on high-stakes testing, resource disparities, and a lack of sustained institutional support. Its impact remains constrained by the gap between policy and classroom reality practices. The indication is that, although the CEFR is potentially beneficial to be used as a framework to transform the educational system of Thailand, a thoughtful recontextualization that foregrounds teacher agency, inclusive pedagogies, and technological integration is necessary. Hence, a recalibration of language education policy is needed to support CEFR as a pedagogical tool, rather than viewing it merely as an assessment metric. As well, curriculum development, teachers’ education, and regional collaboration are essential for a more CEFR-informed approach to innovation across multiple levels of the education system.
Downloads
References
Baker, W., & Jarunthawatchai, W. (2017). English language policy in Thailand. European Journal of Language Policy, 9(1), 27–44.
Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. Routledge.
Chaisiri, P. (2022). The Potential of Translanguaging for English Language Teaching in Thailand. Journal of Studies in the English Language, 17(2), 56–80.
Charttrakul, K., & Damnet, A. (2021). Role of the CEFR and English teaching in Thailand: A case study of Rajabhat Universities. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 12(2), 82–89.
Cheewasukthaworn, K. (2022). Developing a standardized English proficiency test in alignment with the CEFR. PASAA, 63(1), 66–92.
Chen, L. & Wu, Y. (2023). Enhancing ESL learners' engagement through adaptive technology. Language Learning in the Digital Era.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Council of Europe. (2018). CEFR Companion volume with new descriptors. Council of Europe Publishing. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Eiadkaew, P., Sermsook, K., & Nakplad, R. (2025). Enhancing Lecturers’ English Proficiency according to Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) for English Test. KKU International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 15(1), 46-81.
Foley, J. (2019a). Issues on assessment using CEFR in the region. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 12(2), 28–48. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/195583
Foley, J. (2019b). Issues on the initial impact of CEFR in Thailand and the Region. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9, 359–370.
Foley, J. (2022). CLT using CEFR and EIL in Southeast Asia and East Asia in the English Language classroom. RELC Journal. 53(1), 240–252.
Franz, J., & Teo, A. (2018). ‘A2 is normal’-Thai secondary school English teachers’ encounters with CEFR. RELC Journal, 49(3), 322–338.
Harsch, C. (2018). How suitable is the CEFR for setting university entrance standards? Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(1), 102–108.
Hamid, H. A., Fakhruddin, W. F. W. W., Afip, L. A., & Hamid, M. O. (2025). Navigating global standards in local contexts: A systematic review of CEFR-aligned English language curriculum in the ASEAN region. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 10(1), 324-352.
Hiranburana, K. (2020). FRELE-TH: Springboard for holistic English educational reform. LEARN Journal, 13(1), 62–75. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/237826
Hiranburana, K., et al. (2017). A framework of reference for English language education in Thailand (FRELE-TH)—Based on the CEFR, the Thai experience. LEARN Journal, 10(2), 90-119.
Jehdo, K., Yossiri, V., Hayeesani, M., Vongsvivut, S., & Paramal, N. (2024). Challenges and benefits of developing CEFRaligned writing assessments: A case study of Yala Rajabhat University Test of English Proficiency (YRUTEP). Arab World English Journal, 15(1), 352-367. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no1.22
Jones, N., & Saville, N. (2009). European language policy: Assessment, learning, and CEFR. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190509090059
Kanchai, T. (2019). Thai EFL university lecturers’ viewpoints towards impacts of the CEFR on their English language curricula and teaching practice. NIDA Journal of Language and Communication, 24(35), 23–47.
Kosonen, K. (2016). Language policy and education in Southeast Asia. In T. L. McCarty & S. May (Eds.), Language policy and political issues in education (Vol. 1, pp. 477–490). Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02344-1_35
Kremmel, B., Eberharter, K., Konrad, E., Guggenbichler, E., Moser-Frötscher, D., Ebner, V., & Spöttl, C. (2023). The CEFR Companion Volume: Opportunities and challenges for language assessment. Didaktik slawischer Sprachen, 65-83.
Kulsiri, S. (2006). A critical analysis of the 2001 national foreign language standards-based curriculum in the Thai school’s system [Doctoral thesis, University of Canberra].
Lee, H., & Song, J. (2022). Digital inequalities in online post-COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Technology.
Little, D., & Erickson, G. (2015). Learner identity, learner agency, and the assessment of language proficiency: Reflections prompted by CEFR. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 120–139.
Little, D., & Figueras, N. (Eds.). (2022). Reflecting on the common European framework of reference for languages and its companion volume (Vol. 104). Multilingual Matters.
Mahapoonyanont, N., & Songsang, N. (2024). Policy learning and adaptation: Lessons from PISA for educational reform worldwide. International Journal of Stress Management, 31(4), 26-52.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
National Economic and Social Development Plan (NESDB (2017).
National Scheme of Education (2017-2036): National Education Plan.
Nonthaisong, K. (2015). The impact of the English language policy (Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama). https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/2417
North, B. (2014). Putting the Common European Framework of Reference to good use. Language Teaching, 47(2), 228–249.
Novawan, A., Aisyiyah, S., Wijayanti, F., & Samsudin, A. (2018). Exploring the coherence between the EFL curriculum policy and its implementation in the higher education setting. Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication, 5(1), 1–11.
Novawan, A., Tosalem, S. M. P. A., Binarkaheni, S., & Mariana, E. R. (2023). Reflecting on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, and Assessment (CEFR) in the Indonesian Context . Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.25047/jeapco.v9i1.3754
Phaisanan, T., Charttrakul, K., & Damnet, A. (2019). The CEFR-TBL in fostering Thai pre-service teachers’ English-speaking ability using the peer interview task. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(5), 10–19.
Piamsai, C. (2023). Development and use of CEFR-based self-assessment in a Thai tertiary context. PASAA, 66, 81–126.
Phoolaikao, W., & Sukying, A. (2021). Insights into CEFR and its implementation through the lens of pre-service English teachers in Thailand. English Language Teaching, 14(6), 25–35.
Premsrirat, S. (2011). Redefining “Thainess”: Embracing diversity, preserving unity. The Journal of the Royal Institute of Thailand, 3, 54–75.
Raza, K., & Chua, C. (2022). Neoliberal ideologies in teaching and assessing ESP legal English: A case study from the Middle East. In Transnational English Language Assessment Practices in the Age of Metrics (pp. 189-203). Routledge.
Read, J. (2019). The influence of the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) in the Asia-Pacific region. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 12(1), 12-18.
Savski, K. (2019). Putting the plurilingual/pluricultural back into CEFR: Reflecting on policy reform in Thailand and Malaysia. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(2), 644–652.
Savski, K. (2023). CEFR and the ELT practitioner: empowerment or enforcement?. ELT Journal, 77(1), 62-71.
Siripol, P., Rhee, S., Thirakunkovit, S., & LiangItsara, A. (2025). Evaluating the consistency of automated CEFR analyzers: A study of English language text classification. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(4), 3283–3294. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i4.33528
Sriwongsa, O., & Sukying, A. (2023). Reflections on the CEFR in Thailand: Problems and needs of Thai EFL teachers [Doctoral dissertation, Mahasarakham University].
Theppanya, P., Satharatthana, T., & Tangjaijaroensap, N. (2025). English CEFR proficiency with autonomous online learning among Thai tertiary learners in a provincial public university. Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 6(1), 75-96.
Waluyo, B., Zahabi, A., & Ruangsung, L. (2024). Language assessment at a Thai university: A CEFR-based test of English proficiency development. rEFLections, 31(1), 25–47.
Weber, J., & Horner, K. (2012). Introducing multilingualism: A social approach. Routledge.
Wudthayagorn, J. (2018). Mapping the CU-TEP to the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR). LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 11(2), 163–180.
Wudthayagorn, J. (2019). FRELE-TH implementation challenges. Matichon (Thai) Online.
Wudthayagorn, J. (2025). Revisiting English-in-Education Policies in Thailand: Ambitious
Goals, Contradictory Outcomes. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 18(2), 1–13.
Yoon, M. & Kim, H. (2023). Technological Integration and Student Engagement in Digital ESL Learning. TESOL Quarterly
Zheng, Y., Zhang, Y., & Yan, Y. (2016). Investigating the practice of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) outside Europe: A case study on the assessment of writing in English in China (ELT Research Papers, 16.01). British Council. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/393651.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Joseph Foley, Marilyn Fernandez Deocampo, Nita Novianti (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
